Bill Stifler

Conventions for Writing about Literature

There are certain conventions or rules students must follow when writing about literature.

  1. A literary analysis is about a significant meaning examined in the literature. It is not about reading the works or writing about the works. The focus of a literary analysis paper is always on the work of literature.

  2. A literary analysis is always written in present tense. Only use past tense when quoting a passage that is in past tense.

  3. Example: The Call of the Wild by Jack London examines the transformation of Buck from household pet to sled dog to wolf.

  4. The first time an author is mentioned, his or her full name is used. Afterwards, the author is referred to by last name. An analysis will never refer to an author just by first name.

  5. Avoid discussing the author of the work or the author's intentions in writing after initially identifying the author and work. Instead, focus on the meaning of the text as revealed by the details within the work. The exception would be in a paper that is examining a work within its cultural/historical context or as representative of the writer's style or life experiences.

  6. The voice in a story or essay is referred to as the narrator. The voice in a poem is referred to as the speaker. Students should not assume that the narrator or speaker is the author, even when the work appears to be autobiographical. In autobiographical writing, the voice from the work is considered a persona of the author and not the actual author.

  7. Poem, essay, and short story titles will always appear in quotation marks. The titles of books, magazines, journals, newspapers, and databases will always appear in italics.

  8. Indicate line breaks in a poem by a slash. Indicate stanza breaks with a double slash.

  9. Example: Shakespeare describes the steadfastness of love as "an ever-fixed mark / That looks on tempests and is never shaken" (Shakespeare, lines 5-6) because no storm can pull true love off course.
    Example: Although the speaker is angry, he does not berate the woman especially after she seems "delighted" (Alexie, line 27 ) after he brings "her an orange juice // back from the food car" (Alexie, lines 28-29).
  10. A good analysis is supported by specific evidence from the work or works.

  11. Depending on the instructor, a writer may be able to write the essay without background explanations about the text or critical tools used. However, other instructors suggest that students' papers should assume the intelligence of the reader but also assume that the reader is unfamiliar with the work or the critical tools applied, in which case, the student will need to give these explanations. Consult the instructor to know which approach to take.

ENGL1020 Composition 2